This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tunceli article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Turkey Mid‑importance

	Turkey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kurdistan

	Kurdistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kurdistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Kurdistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KurdistanWikipedia:WikiProject KurdistanTemplate:WikiProject KurdistanKurdistan articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

It is requested that an image or photograph of Tunceli be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Turkey may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Comments

category

I don't see wat u mean. they're clearly two different categories. I see there are some efforts being made by some pov-pushers to delete the category 'cities in turkish kurdistan'. however, as long as this category exists, this city falls in its scope. so I'm adding it back. please discuss here before reverting again, if u wish to do so Soapyyy 06:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't per tons of WP:V issues. The other cat is sufficient. We are talking about a controversial and unofficial region with undefined borders and not about some defined administrative region. Even Anatolia is more clearly defined, but it doesn't possess such cats - that's normal because it is a geographic region to begin with. The dispute as to whether it falls into the scope of that category can go on for eternity. Please refrain from calling other editors as "pov-pushers". thanks. Baristarim 06:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As long as the category exists, I'm assuming it is to be used. If the category isn't to be used, then it will be deleted. I will wait until the vote about the category unfolds, but if the result is 'keep', I will add back the category, because this is precisely the kind of articles the category was created for. I didn't call you a 'pov-pusher' specifically. thx. Soapyyy 06:31, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Still WP:V issues. That Tunceli is Turkish Kurdistan is a matter of interpretation. That's all I am trying to say and is the main problem to begin with. Still won't matter because there are no cats like "Cities in Anatolia" either. It just seems that some people wish that there would be some sort of a different country there, but there isn't. Until that day, there is no logic to such inclusions. That's all I am trying to say. Baristarim 07:01, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tunceli law

Is the "Law on Administration of the Tunceli Province" directly related with this city ? The Kudish alternative name Mamekî and Zazaki alternative name is Mamekiye, not Dersim. Takabeg (talk) 09:00, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Dersim was the name given to an area which is almost Tunceli Province, and not the city. 12:25, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

In Zazaki People Say Dêsim

The wright name of the historically region wasn't call Dersim by Zaza people. It is and was called Dêsim. The scripture "Dersim" was an act of conforming the name into (ottoman) turkish like they did with Muzur into Munzur or other non-turkish names like Trapezund into Trabzon, Angora into Ankara and so on. Therefore it is not true to write "Der-Sim" has the meaning of "Silver-Gate" (Der - Gate ; Sim - Silver). Because it would be just an untrue story. Weşiya sıma! ZonêMa (talk) 18:28, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Tunceli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:16, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]